Smart Technologies for Water Sewage Systems and Decision-Making with Circular Spherical Fuzzy Framework

Authors

  • Abrar Hussain 1) College of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China; 2) College of Mechatronics and Control Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2289-7464
  • Muhammad Ahmad Department of Mathematics, Riphah International University (Lahore Campus), Lahore, Pakistan Author https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5516-7897
  • Kifayat Ullah 1) Department of Mathematics, Riphah International University (Lahore Campus), Lahore, Pakistan; 2) Department of Mathematics, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1438-6413
  • Zeeshan Ali Department of Information Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin, Taiwan Author https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3443-2840
  • Oumaima Saidani Department of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9520-3174

Keywords:

Circular spherical fuzzy set, Dombi aggregation operators, Water sewage system, Artificial intelligence and decision support system

Abstract

Smart technologies play an increasingly attractive and transformative role in modern water and sewage systems, particularly under uncertain and dynamic environments. By integrating sensors, Internet of Things (IoT) devices, and artificial intelligence, these technologies enable real-time monitoring and adaptive control of complex water networks. To handle uncertainties such as fluctuating demand, climate variability, and data incompleteness, we develop an improved decision-making (DM) model using the circular spherical fuzzy set (Cr-SFS). The Cr-SFS is a flexible structure for managing uncertainty in human opinions. This article presents a new class of aggregation operators, namely the circular spherical fuzzy Dombi weighted averaging (Cr-SFDWA), circular spherical fuzzy Dombi weighted geometric (Cr-SFDWG), circular spherical fuzzy Dombi ordered weighted averaging (Cr-SFDOWA), and circular spherical fuzzy Dombi ordered weighted geometric (Cr-SFDOWG) operators. The realistic qualities and exceptional cases of these operators are also clarified through appropriate properties. An intelligent decision-making methodology for the MADM problem is applied to resolve real-life applications. A numerical example is presented to investigate an appropriate artificial intelligence-based water sewage system using decision analysis models and mathematical approaches. Moreover, a comprehensive comparison method is presented to illustrate the effectiveness and relevance of the proposed aggregation relative to existing approaches. The study is concluded with a summary of the main findings and the potential contributions of advanced decision-making techniques.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zhang, S., & Ye, J. (2024). MADM Model Using Einstein Aggregation Operators of Sine Single-Valued Neutrosophic Values and Its Application. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 64, 96–112.

Akram, M., Naz, S., Santos-Garcıa, G., & Saeed, M. R. (2023). Extended CODAS method for MAGDM with 2-tuple linguistic T-spherical fuzzy sets. AIMS Mathematics, 8(2), 3428–3468. https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/math.2023176

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

GEORGE J, K., & Bo, Y. (2008). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic, theory and applications. -. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/7049/

Goguen, J. A. (1967). L-fuzzy sets. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 18(1), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(67)90189-8

Zadeh, L. A. (1978). Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(78)90029-5

Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3

Yager, R. R. (2013). Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(4), 958–965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989

Yager, R. R. (2016). Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 25(5), 1222–1230. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005

Cuong, B. C. (2013). Picture fuzzy sets-first results. Part 1, seminar neuro-fuzzy systems with applications. Institute of Mathematics, Hanoi.

Ashraf, S., Abdullah, S., Aslam, M., Qiyas, M., & Kutbi, M. A. (2019). Spherical fuzzy sets and its representation of spherical fuzzy t-norms and t-conorms. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 36(6), 6089–6102. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-181941

Godo, L., & Torra, V. (2000). On aggregation operators for ordinal qualitative information. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1109/91.842149

Akram, M., . S., & Arshad, M. (2019). Bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS and bipolar fuzzy ELECTRE-I methods to diagnosis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 39, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-019-0980-8

Mahmood, T., Ullah, K., Khan, Q., & Jan, N. (2019). An approach toward decision-making and medical diagnosis problems using the concept of spherical fuzzy sets. Neural Computing and Applications, 31(11), 7041–7053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3521-2

Lundström, A., & Hellström, F. (2015). Getting to know electric cars through an app. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI ’15, 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799272

Khan, M. J., Kumam, W., & Alreshidi, N. A. (2022). Divergence measures for circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 116, 105455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105455

Hussain, A., Ullah, K., Zhang, J., & Mahmood, T. (2024). Intuitionistic fuzzy muirhead means motivated by frank triangular norms. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 43(6), 320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-024-02661-2

Stopka, O., Stopková, M., & Pečman, J. (2022). Application of multi-criteria decision making methods for evaluation of selected passenger electric cars: A case study. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, 24(3), A133-A141. https://doi.org/10.26552/com.C.2022.3.A133-A141

Więckowski, J., Wątróbski, J., Shkurina, A., & Sałabun, W. (2024). Adaptive multi-criteria decision making for electric vehicles: A hybrid approach based on RANCOM and ESP-SPOTIS. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(10), 270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10901-4

Vitta, S. (2021). Electric cars – Assessment of ‘green’ nature vis-à-vis conventional fuel driven cars. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 30, e00339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00339

Kahraman, C., & Otay, I. (2022). Extension of VIKOR Method Using Circular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. In C. Kahraman, S. Cebi, S. Cevik Onar, B. Oztaysi, A. C. Tolga, & I. U. Sari (Eds.), Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques for Emerging Conditions and Digital Transformation (Vol. 308, pp. 48–57). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85577-2_6

Gündoğdu, F. K., & Kahraman, C. (2019). A novel fuzzy TOPSIS method using emerging interval-valued spherical fuzzy sets. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 85, 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.06.003

Siksnelyte-Butkiene, I., Zavadskas, E. K., & Streimikiene, D. (2020). Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) for the Assessment of Renewable Energy Technologies in a Household: A Review. Energies, 13(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13051164

Ullah, K., Hassan, N., Mahmood, T., Jan, N., & Hassan, M. (2019). Evaluation of Investment Policy Based on Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Using Interval Valued T-Spherical Fuzzy Aggregation Operators. Symmetry, 11(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11030357

Hussain, A., Ullah, K., Pamucar, D., & Simic, V. (2024). Intuitionistic fuzzy Sugeno-Weber decision framework for sustainable digital security assessment. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 137, 109085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109085

Lee, D., & Yoon, S. N. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence-based technologies in the healthcare industry: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010271

Shan, T., Tay, F. R., & Gu, L. (2021). Application of Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry. Journal of Dental Research, 100(3), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034520969115

Zhou, L., Abdullah, S., Zafar, H., Muhammad, S., Qadir, A., & Huang, H. (2025). Analysis of artificial neural network based on pq-rung orthopair fuzzy linguistic muirhead mean operators. Expert Systems with Applications, 276, 127157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127157

Lawal, A. I., & Kwon, S. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence to rock mechanics: An overview. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 13(1), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.05.010

Wan, H., Liu, G., & Zhang, L. (2021). Research on the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Computer Network Technology. Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering, 704–707. https://doi.org/10.1145/3501409.3501536

Ghodousian, A., Ahmadi, A., & Dehghani, A. (2017). Solving a non-convex non-linear optimization problem constrained by fuzzy relational equations and Sugeno-Weber family of t-norms. Journal of Algorithms and Computation, 49(2), 63–101.

Kauers, M., Pillwein, V., & Saminger-Platz, S. (2011). Dominance in the family of Sugeno–Weber t-norms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 181(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2011.04.007

Farahbod, F., & Eftekhari, M. (2012). Comparison of different T-norm operators in classification problems. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems, 2(3), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijfls.2012.2303

Troiano, L., Rodriguez-Muniz, L. J., Marinaro, P., & Diaz, I. (2014). Statistical analysis of parametric t-norms. Information Sciences, 257, 138–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.09.041

Ghodousian, A. (2019). Optimization of linear problems subjected to the intersection of two fuzzy relational inequalities defined by Dubois-Prade family of t-norms. Information Sciences, 503, 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.06.058

Hussain, A., Ullah, K., Moslem, S., & Senapati, T. (2025). Decision algorithms for solar panel selection using T-spherical fuzzy Sugeno-Weber triangular norms. Energy Reports, 13, 6651–6668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.05.086

Hussain, A., Ullah, K., Almas, S., Moslem, S., & Senapati, T. (2024). Evaluation of Data Analysis Software Using T-Spherical Fuzzy Einstein Aggregation Operators with Unknown Weights. IEEE Access. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10663083/

Ali, Z., & Pamucar, D. (2025). Analysis of Wireless Communications for Smart Grid: MABAC Model Based on Complex Propositional Picture Fuzzy Sugeno Weber Power Aggregation Information. Systems and Soft Computing, 200248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sasc.2025.200248

Anjum, M., Simic, V., Alrasheedi, M. A., & Shahab, S. (2024). T-spherical fuzzy-CRITIC-WASPAS model for the evaluation of cooperative intelligent transportation system scenarios. IEEE Access, 12, 61137–61151. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3392019

Ashraf, S., Abdullah, S., Mahmood, T., Ghani, F., & Mahmood, T. (2019). Spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in multi-attribute decision making problems. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 36(3), 2829–2844. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-172009

Puzhakkara, T. J., & Jose, S. (2024). Circular Linear Diophantine Fuzzy Sets and Their Application in Medical Diagnosis. New Mathematics and Natural Computation, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793005726500171

Hussain, A., & Ullah, K. (2024). An intelligent decision support system for spherical fuzzy sugeno-weber aggregation operators and real-life applications. Spectrum of Mechanical Engineering and Operational Research, 1(1), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.31181/smeor11202415

Pamucar, D., Lazarević, D., Dobrodolac, M., Simic, V., & Görçün, Ö. F. (2024). Prioritization of crowdsourcing models for last-mile delivery using fuzzy Sugeno–Weber framework. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 128, 107414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107414

Atanassov, K. T. (2020). Circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 39(5), 5981–5986. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189072

Bozyiǧit, M. C., Ünver, M., & Olgun, M. (2024). Circular Pythagorean Fuzzy Choquet Integral Operators and Applications to Multi-criteria Decision Making. In C. Kahraman, S. Cevik Onar, S. Cebi, B. Oztaysi, A. C. Tolga, & I. Ucal Sari (Eds.), Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (Vol. 1090, pp. 635–643). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67192-0_71

Kendall, M. G. (1938). A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika, 30(1–2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81

Ashraf, S., Iqbal, W., Ahmad, S., & Khan, F. (2023). Circular Spherical Fuzzy Sugeno Weber Aggregation Operators: A Novel Uncertain Approach for Adaption a Programming Language for Social Media Platform. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3329242

Sarkar, A., & Goswami, S. S. (2026). A Review of the Application of MCDM Methods in Business Analytics. Applied Decision Analytics, 2(1), 150-180.

Published

2026-04-29

How to Cite

Hussain, A., Ahmad, M., Ullah, K., Ali, Z., & Saidani, O. (2026). Smart Technologies for Water Sewage Systems and Decision-Making with Circular Spherical Fuzzy Framework. Journal of Contemporary Decision Science, 2(1), 194-215. https://cds-journal.org/index.php/cds/article/view/15