Benchmarking the Financial Performance of the Corporate Governance Index under Borsa Istanbul Companies Using SITDE and MABAC Framework
Keywords:
Financial performance, Corporate Governance Index, Borsa Istanbul, SITDE, MABAC , MCDMAbstract
Financial performance is a fundamental indicator of how effectively, efficiently, and sustainably firms utilize their financial resources within a given period. Financial analysis techniques are employed to assess a firm's current financial position, evaluate past performance, and provide a basis for future strategic and financial planning. Financial analysis is a critical decision-support tool for internal managers, investors, creditors, and other stakeholders. This study aims to examine the financial performance of companies listed in the Corporate Governance Index under Borsa Istanbul for the period 2018–2023 by employing multi-criteria decision-making methods. The analysis utilizes the SITDE and MABAC techniques. Banks, financial institutions, insurance companies, and firms with incomplete financial data during the research period were excluded, resulting in a final sample of 28 companies. Financial data were obtained from the Public Disclosure Platform, and a total of 23 financial ratios were incorporated into the analysis. The findings indicate that total liabilities emerged as the most influential criterion in 2018, 2019, and 2021, highlighting the significant role of capital structure in firm performance. In 2020 and 2023, net profit/loss for the period was the dominant factor, suggesting that value creation capacity primarily shaped performance outcomes. Operating profit was the leading criterion in 2022, emphasizing the importance of operational efficiency and core business profitability. Firm-level results reveal that Iskenderun Demir ve Celik A.S. ranked highest in 2018 and 2020, Enka Insaat ve Sanayi A.S. in 2021, and Pegasus Hava Tasimaciligi A.S. in 2019, 2022, and 2023, with pandemic-related effects explaining Pegasus's relatively lower rankings in 2020–2021.
Downloads
References
Cengiz, S., & Karabayır, M. E. (2022). Kurumsal yönetim ile finansal performans ilişkisi: Türkiye'de ampirik bir araştırma. Muhasebe ve Vergi Uygulamaları Dergisi (Journal of Accounting and Taxation Studies), 15(2), 321–348. https://doi.org/10.29067/muvu.1053921
Okan, E. E., & Uğurlu, E. (2022). Corporate governance rating in Turkey: Investigation of scores of Borsa İstanbul Corporate Governance Index (XKURY). İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(43), 451-473. https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.1091327
Küçükoğlu, S., İlter Küçükçolak, N., & Küçükçolak, R. A. (2022). Kurumsal yönetim derecelendirmesi ile pay değeri arasındaki ilişki: Borsa İstanbul örneği. Sosyoekonomi, 30(52), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2022.02.22
Vatansever, K., & Bayraktar, T. (2025). Examination of Financial Performance of Manufacturing Sector Companies in the BIST Participation Sustainability Index by MEREC and COBRA Methods. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(Özel Sayı), 275-304. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1677702
Katrancı, A., Kundakcı, N., & Pamucar, D. (2025). Financial performance evaluation of firms in BIST 100 index with ITARA and COBRA methods. Financial Innovation, 11(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00704-5
Yılmaz, N., & Civelek, M. (2025). Küresel Krizler Bağlamında Mevduat Bankacılığı Sektöründe Finansal Performansın LOPCOW-RAFSI ÇKKV Yöntemleri ile Değerlendirilmesi: Kırgızistan Örneği. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(3), 1191-1217. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1613593
Durdu, D., Akbulut, O. Y., & Aydın, Y. (2025). Entegre Bir Gri Karar Verme Çerçevesiyle Türk Sigorta Sektöründe Kurumsal Finansal Performans Değerlendirmesi. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(3), 1293-1317. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1644941
Oztemiz, H. H., Vatansever, K., & Bayraktar, T. (2025). Sustainable Financial Performance Analysis of Logistics Companies Listed on Borsa Istanbul: An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach. Sustainability, 17(20), 9243. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209243
Assefa, D. Z., Ishizaka, A., & La Torre, D. (2025). Exploring the ESG-finance relationship through PROMETHEE ranking. Annals of Operations Research, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-025-06797-0
Mitra, A., Jalan, A. K., Biswas, P., & Gupta, S. (2025). Enhancing investment decisions in Indian stock market through MCDM approach. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 35(3), 291-327. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2025.147157
Veeramani, C., Venugopal, R., & Edalatpanah, S. A. (2025). Enhanced stock selection using a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach with interval type-2 fuzzy framework. OPSEARCH, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-025-00983-1
Fauzi, N. F. F. M., Rodzi, Z. M., Mustapha, N., Al-ASharqi, F., & Ahmad, A. G. (2025). Bipolar Pythagorean Neutrosophic Generalized Weighted Hamacher Heronian Mean (BPN-GWHHM) for MCDM in Business Resilience. Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 21(5), 2615-2628. https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v21n5.4338
Ergülen, A., & Çalık, A. (2025). F-BWM-MARCOS approach for performance evaluation of Türkiye's top 500 industrial enterprises in the pre-pandemic and pandemic era. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 32(7), 2551-2577. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2023-0336
Gopisetty, Y. B., & Sama, H. R. (2025). Skewness impact through distributional evaluation (SITDE) method: a new method in multi-criteria decision making. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 76(6), 1204-1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2024.2416910
Pamučar, D., Petrović, I., & Ćirović, G. (2018). Modification of the Best–Worst and MABAC methods: A novel approach based on interval-valued fuzzy-rough numbers. Expert systems with applications, 91, 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.08.042
Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., Allen, F., & Edmans, A. (2020). Principles of corporate finance (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.3.213
Penman, S. H. (2021). Financial statement analysis and security valuation (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://doi.org/10.1036/9781260247094
Dang, C., Li, Z. F., & Yang, C. (2018). Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 120, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.105687
Titman, S., Keown, A. J., & Martin, J. D. (2021). Financial management: Principles and applications (13th ed.). Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119596781
Li, Y., Mangena, M., & Pike, R. (2021). The effect of audit committee characteristics on intellectual capital disclosure and firm value. British Accounting Review, 53(4), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2020.100110
Omağ, A. (2023). Likidite analizinde kullanılan oranlar üzerine bir inceleme. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(3), 783–792. https://doi.org/10.29106/fesa.1329910
Emir, S., & Kıymık, H. (2021). Sürdürülebilirlik düzeyinin finansal performans üzerindeki etkisinin değerlendirilmesi: Borsa İstanbul'da bir araştırma. Muhasebe ve Vergi Uygulamaları Dergisi, 14(1), 101–128. https://doi.org/10.29067/muvu.718278
Demirhan, D. (2022). İmalat ve hizmet sektörlerinde karlılık oranlarını etkileyen faktörlerin analizi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 94, 31–52. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.1054212
White, G. I., Sondhi, A. C., & Fried, D. (2021). The analysis and use of financial statements (4th ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119577551
Oh, H. I., & Penman, S. (2024). The accruals–cash flow relation and the evaluation of accrual accounting. Abacus, 60(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12307
Kieso, D. E., Weygandt, J. J., & Warfield, T. D. (2020). Intermediate accounting (17th ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119599966
Tasáryová, K., & Pakšiová, R. (2021). The impact of equity information as an important factor in assessing business performance. Information, 12(2), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12020085
Chinery, L., Allaouidine, C., Tomazzini, A., Larson, M., & Gülmezoglu, A. M. (2020). Cost of goods sold analysis and recommendations to reduce costs of co-packaged mifepristone–misoprostol for medical abortion. Reproductive Health, 17, 171. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01012-8
Atrill, P., & McLaney, E. (2006). Accounting and finance for non-specialists (12th ed.). Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781292437696
Wild, J. J., Shaw, K. W., & Chiappetta, B. (2023). Fundamental accounting principles (25th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://doi.org/10.1036/9781265359464
Baños-Caballero, S., García-Teruel, P. J., & Martínez-Solano, P. (2020). Net operating working capital and firm value: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Corporate Finance, 60, 101404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101404
Fridson, M. S., & Alvarez, F. (2022). Financial statement analysis: A practitioner's guide (5th ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119834937
Fettahoglu, S., Allak, S., & Özcan Türkkan, B. (2025). ESG Scores and Corporate Performance in Emerging Markets: Evidence from E7 Countries. Sustainability, 17(19), 8936. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198936
Andoko, A., & Angeline, A. (2023). The influence of debt to equity ratio, operating profit margin ratio and operating expense toward entity income tax of infrastructure, utility and transportation companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW, 4(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.8888/ijospl.v4i1.115
Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2020). Valuation: Measuring and managing the value of companies (7th ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119611866
Lai, Z., & Yuchen, Z. (2025). The Impact of Organizational Change on Firm Performance: Analysis Based on SCM Modeling. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251358973
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Galip Cihan Yalçın, Hamide Özyürek, Ceren Dişçi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under the